Skip to content

so focus then

Back when I was on Twitter actively, I remember being on a train to London for an examiners’ meeting (those days are thankfully over forever now). I remarked on Twitter how boring the Lincolnshire countryside is – flat, continuous farmland. A reply came from my online friend Richard McCann (whom I have met once in real life) that it “depends where your focus is”.

Fair to say that my focus has slipped a little bit in the last couple of days. The top has not toppled, but it may have faltered. I’m getting ready to do some serious page layout work in preparation for a couple things I’m going to publish in the next week or so. So as I had settled down to do some work on writing definitions for the Media handbook on the desktop machine upstairs (too cold and wet to work outside), I thought I’d better do a quick trial run with InDesign. Turns out the installation was all stuffed up. Spent most of the day troubleshooting it. Done now, but a day in which a felt not very productive from a creative point of view.

New focus now though. Retrieve the eye from the bottom of the cup, pop it back in, and you’re good to go.

so making enid blyton cool then

It turns out that there are moves afoot to change the dialogue in the Famous Five books in order to make them more accessible to contemporary children. Some independent research has suggested that they find words like luncheon and squared (in the sense of sorted out or reconciled) difficult to get past. The initiative has come from the publishers who appear to have the rights to the novels, and to me it appears to be entirely commercial. If you’re going to sell more copies of Five Examine Their Responses To Anxiety And Stress by modernising the dialogue, then I guess it’s a no-brainer to do so.

The flip side of this argument is that texts are artefacts that have cultural significance, and that interfering with them is an act of vandalism. As the BBC Breakfast presenter pointed out, few people would have any time for someone who wanted to modernise the dialogue in Dickens novels. It’s the issue of whether the sanctity of the artefact is more important than how it meshes with modern culture. If doesn’t mesh, then do the work to make it mesh. Learn the old vocabulary and the quirks of the old syntax – now a much easier undertaking in the mindset of the Googleverse. Some might say. Others might say that texts are and always have been essentially fluid, so the notion of sanctity is necessarily a slippery one. Chaucer’s work was never printed in his lifetime: the technology did not exist. Does that mean that we should really only distribute copies of his work in medieval handwriting? What we take to be authoritative versions of Shakespeare plays, widely studied in schools an universities, are the product of centuries of editing – modernised spelling, choices made by editors between disputed alternative versions, modernised punctuation, added scene divisions. The text we now read is quite a long way from editions published at time the plays were performed.

Translations. Is the Russian version of The Philosopher’s Stone actually a different novel? Languages divide the world up differently from each other, and our reality is very much determined by our native language. If we shouldn’t modernise Enid Blyton, should we therefore not translate Tolstoy but learn Russian instead? There’s also the argument that the practice of modernising old stories is not new. Witness Lamb’s Tales From Shakespeare (1807).

I think in the end I’m on the side of expecting kids to deal with words like gosh. They’re perhaps a bit alienating, but children need to learn the habit of thinking about words and expanding their vocabulary. The mode in which a text is presented need not necessarily be the idiom of the moment.

The real test of a committed publisher would be providing free upgrades to the latest editions of a text, once you had bought the first edition. Now that would be something.

In other news, the hole our roof is finally fixed. Bring on the rain. It was nothing major – just some flashing near a chimney and a couple of slates. But breaches in your domestic space, especially from above, do create a sense of unease. So they do.

so wi-fi and marmite then

I’m thinking that wi-fi is the networking equivalent of squeezy Marmite. Great when it works well, irritating when it starts to clog up and you get it all over your hands, profoundly depressing when it fails and just blows air. I’m writing this on a laptop connected to my home network via wi-fi. The signal strength is “excellent” and the speed is at maximum, but I know that this is only because the wireless access point is in the corner of the room, about ten feet from where I’m sitting. If I go the other side of the wall, into the garden, the signal strength and speed start to get just a little bit less reliable. If I go two floors up to the attic, it’s a two cans and a string scenario.

Since my eldest daughter has returned from university, things have been changed around in her room, and the ethernet cable I’d arranged to emerge from beneath the laminate floor was no longer in the right place for her desktop PC. Tried the wi-fi option, as I had installed an access point a few years ago for the convenience of moving the laptop around. Guess what? Network access on her PC kept cutting out, even after I’d moved the wi-fi access point to just above her room. Late last night I resolved that lifting the edge of the laminate floor and re-routing the network cable was the best option. Today I set to and took the beading up from the edge of the floor, and then had a thought that this was a good opportunity to put in a proper socket where the computer now is, running some 2.5mm twin and earth cable around the edge of the laminate and then putting the beading back down. Neater than running trunking round the skirting board. Since the room had been re-arranged, the PC had been running off an old extension lead I’d run under the floor a few years ago when the floor was originally put down. Yes I know. Felt good to put it right though and install a proper wall mounted socket. The Marmite is now in stately glass jar, stored the right way up.

All this meant that writing I had planned for today didn’t get started until later, but get started it did. I’ve done a bit more on writing definitions of media analysis terminology for the A-Level handbook, and some more on the introduction to my own short volume of poems Mandrakes and Pin-Ups, soon to be published through my own company mollybleed.

so films then

Time to catch up with commenting on the films I’ve seen over the last few months.

Harry Brown is an easy watch. Contrary to popular wisdom, I’ve always struggled to see Michael Caine as an actor with any credible range at all – just a lucky guy who’s been cast in a few iconic roles over the years. I think the reverence we all now feel for him is down to him being old and still cast in high profile roles. That said, this is a serviceable vigilante movie but has nothing like the subtlety of Gran Torino.

Another movie hyped beyond its actual merit was The Hurt Locker. Its opposition to Avatar in the public media-fuelled Oscar war was absurd, and based on little beyond an entirely invented rivalry between the two directors. I saw or heard little evidence that this rivalry had any basis in how those two people felt. The Hurt Locker is beautifully filmed but to a large extent vacuous. It follows the Hollywood Top Gun narrative and representational framework more closely than you might think, and at one point risks defining itself unambiguously as a guys-on-a-mission film.

First two were blu-ray ventures. Crazy Heart was a cinema trip – to the partially preserved Picture House in Hebden Bridge. Partially because a good deal of money still needs to be spent on it, particularly in the toilets, but the cinema does boast more leg room than Air Force One, and the volunteers who serve coffee and biscuits on a Thursday morning are very much appreciated. The film’s principal talent is Maggie Gyllenhaal, who I still think has twenty times the acting talent of her brother, apart from in Donnie Darko – arguably the defining sci-fi fantasy movie. Arguably. Jeff Bridges is of course excellent too, convincing as the country star whose light has faded under the influence of a long term alcohol habit. It really helps your appreciation of this movie if you like country music. Highly pleasant pub lunch afterwards in the White Swan, a pub I frequented when I worked at Pennine Heritage in the mid eighties. Another pivotal memory from that day is checking my email on the bus and seeing that I’d been sent my first block of ISBN numbers.

Seven Pounds strengthens my opinion that Will Smith is a serious acting talent – not just a Hollywood A-lister. Check him out in as a teenager in Six Degrees Of Separation giving Donald Sutherland a run for his money.

I was very pleasantly surprised by Valkyrie, largely because I’m usually profoundly bored by filmic representations of historical events. This one maintained the tension throughout, even though everyone of course knows how it turned out. Also has a nicely visceral surround track. Good reference scene near the start for calibrating your sub-woofer. If you’re so inclined.

Terminator: Salvation is one of those you watch because you feel you have to see the latest episode in the franchise. It lacks Arnie, apart from an absurd bit of CGI near the end where they recreate him in shiny plastic. Technically, a competent movie which explores some of the elements of the whole Terminator thing with reasonably engaging degree of competence. Kind of. Some enjoyable low frequency thuds.

9 is a post-apocalypse animation about beings made of cloth.

I’ve been through several shifts my opinion of Dead Poets Society over the last couple of decades. In the end, it’s close to my heart because it’s about the process of engaging students in the educational process as emotional beings – not faceless conduits for the production of data, as is the fashion now.

Nowhere Boy features the early career of John Lennon. Engaging in parts, but it’s still hard to escape the observation that all this stuff is a matter of historical record.

Now Paper Heart does not draw lazily on historical events, and just happens to be a charming experiment in form that pretty much pays off. Part documentary, part fantasy, it features Michael Cera as the anchor to the somewhat chaotic performance of the stand-up comic Charlyne Yi – the girl who doesn’t believe in love. Check it out. The only disappointment was that Cera was not interviewed in the DVD extras. Maybe he wanted to preserve the mystery about why he involved himself in this project.

Narrative experiments always get my attention. 500 Days Of Summer selects in a non-chronological way from some of the five-hundred days of Tom’s relationship with a girl called Summer. That’s it really. But that’s all there needs to be. It’s great. See it.

Oh yes: I remember Body Of Lies now. One of those where the under-cover operative gets emotionally involved in his under-cover life and wants to stay there. Iraq is the context. Very serviceably done by the now very adept Leonardo DiCaprio. Not the finest movie Ridley Scott has ever made, but more honest than The Hurt Locker. By far.

Four Lions. Now there’s a film. Sustained roar from the consistent firing of all eight cylinders beneath the bonnet of Chris Morris’ comedic muscle car intellect. A difficult subject to do with any sensitivity, but Morris succeeds in creating suicide bombers who we can relate to as humans, even if their ideology is at best questionable. I challenge you not to laugh against the depths of your better judgement.

This next paragraph consists mainly of the statement I made on Facebook at the time. It is a truth universally to be acknowledged that there can never be too many viewings of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off. It’s a movie that may one day save the world.

Knowing is good sci-fi. Nothing very much to redefine the genre, but it works. The specific sub-genre is the one where aliens know more than we do about what’s going to happen to us, and communicate through children.

Much as I wanted to like it, and in line with warnings I was given before I saw it, Tim Burton’s Alice In Wonderland is rubbish. Charles Lutwidge Dodgson revolves in his grave at 10,000rpm as the story is rationalised into a conventional polarisation of good and evil, and the mise-en-scène looks like it’s the product of the “Tim Burton” preset in Final Cut Pro.

It was great to see Brazil again. Although this I time realised that Sam Lowry is actually an idiot. Maybe it’s an age thing.

Which brings me to Inception. Is there any more I can add to what’s already been said? First movie of the summer holiday. Still feeling that other-worldly transition from term time to summer break. Despite what people who don’t teach might think, the end of the summer term is actually a rather strange, flat experience; so you can imagine how this movie distorted my perception of reality even further. We’re two weeks into the holiday now. I went into it with the resolve that it would be the most productive of my career so far. And so far the top is still spinning.

Youth In Revolt was reviewed by Eric Kohn as “Superbad meets Fight Club.” In the end that’s not a very helpful concept. It’s actually better than Fight Club. Now that you’ve picked yourself up off the floor, I’ll explain that I’ve always thought Fight Club was a massively overrated film. So Michael Cera’s light foray into alter ego came as a scented breath of snow-kissed Alpine air compared to the self-involved halitosis of Tyler Durden. Oh – and it’s not as funny as Superbad but it is funny and it makes you feel good. It’s a feel-good movie, so it is.

That’s it. I’ve caught up.

so forthcoming movie reviews then

More as an aide memoire for me than anything else, here are the films I have queued up in my mind for reviewing: Harry Brown, The Hurt Locker, Crazy Heart, Seven Pounds, Valkyrie, Terminator: Salvation, 9, Dead Poets Society, Nowhere Boy, Paper Heart, 500 Days Of Summer, Body Of Lies, Four Lions, Ferris Bueller’s Day Off, Knowing, Alice In Wonderland, Brazil, Inception, Youth In Revolt.